On Jan 15, 10:33*am, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> powers.
>
> MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> Google should know more about the company first.
>
> China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> have been floating around the world for so many centuries.

The main reason why Google wants to quit China is because it cannot
compete with the local set-up Baidu. It has to look for a honorable
retreat.
F.O. Google, a.s.a.p. and a.f.a.p. Good riddance!

In
news:75f5c851-09a9-4ab1-869c-dc8aba3c417f@p24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
jimgavon <jimgavon@gmail.com> wrote:

> F.O. Google, a.s.a.p. and a.f.a.p. Good riddance!

He says, as he posts through Google's server, using a Google email
address.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN [email]bert@iphouse.com[/email]

In news:0a38c354-375e-43af-9095-ea6ffdf90a2e@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com
wogwacker <wogwacker@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fuck Google.

He says, posting through Google's server, using a Google email address.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN [email]bert@iphouse.com[/email]

On Jan 14, 10:36*pm, nickpelson <nickpel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 12:23*pm, wogwacker <wogwac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 10:33*am, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> > > the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> > > establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> > > is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> > > Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> > > lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> > > five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> > > land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> > > decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> > > independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> > > Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> > > up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> > > under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> > > MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> > > has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> > > The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> > > fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> > > allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> > > burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> > > rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> > > powers.
>
> > > MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> > > management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> > > a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> > > down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> > > not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> > > will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> > > the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> > > like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> > > about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> > > Google should know more about the company first.
>
> > > China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> > > seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> > > about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> > > Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> > > something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> > > can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> > > have been floating around the world for so many centuries.
>
> > Well said! Google's action is typical of those barbaric Westerners.
> > These people swagger into any country and *behave the way they like,
> > without any regard to the local law or any respect for the local
> > authority. These damn White trash have done so much damage to the
> > world. They destroy lives and properties all over the whole with their
> > advanced weapons. They spread deadly diseases throughout the world in
> > the name of individual freedom. They screw up the finances of the
> > whole world and create so much poverty and misery. Despite all this,
> > they still think they are the superior ones.
>
> > Fuck all the westerners. Fuck Google. This is especially easy since
> > there are two o's in "Google".
>
> This is political. Google is objecting to the accounts of Chinese
> dissidents being hacked. The Western powers are all praise for Google.
> It is part of the dirty US strategy to destabilize China. Anyone that
> challenges the Chinese government is a hero of the westerners who are
> always dreaming of, and yearning for, a China in chaos. If the
> Islamists were to use Google China to recruit Chinese Muslims to plot
> against the US, would the US govt not work with Google and the Chinese
> govt to stop it? These westerners are despicable.
>
> Unfortunately, the Chinese is slowly but surely under the control of
> the westerners. Economically, Western MNCs can hold China hostage on
> any issue they choose. Culturally, the Chinese are becoming more and
> more westernised. Like those people who were colonised by the
> westerners, the Chinese are also blindly looking to the western ways
> and values. The Chinese is going to pay heavy price for these in this
> round of conflict.

Modernization is inherently Westernization. Using today's modern
conveniences are Westernization. You can not get away from
westernization today unless you want to go back to the bad old days of
Confucianism and starvation and hunger and war.

On Jan 15, 3:56*am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 9:33*pm, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> > the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> > establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> > is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> > Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> > lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> > five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> > land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> > decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> > independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> > Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> > up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> > under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> > MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> > has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> > The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> > fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> > allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> > burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> > rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> > powers.
>
> > MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> > management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> > a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> > down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> > not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> > will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> > the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> > like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> > about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> > Google should know more about the company first.
>
> > China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> > seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> > about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> > Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> > something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> > can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> > have been floating around the world for so many centuries.
>
> Well said.

> Many westerners still harbor the idea that they are above China's laws.

So does the Chinese government.

Have the marines landed?



On Jan 15, 7:57*am, "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 3:56*am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 14, 9:33*pm, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> > > the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> > > establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> > > is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> > > Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> > > lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> > > five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> > > land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> > > decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> > > independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> > > Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> > > up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> > > under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> > > MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> > > has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> > > The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> > > fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> > > allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> > > burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> > > rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> > > powers.
>
> > > MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> > > management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> > > a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> > > down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> > > not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> > > will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> > > the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> > > like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> > > about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> > > Google should know more about the company first.
>
> > > China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> > > seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> > > about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> > > Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> > > something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> > > can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> > > have been floating around the world for so many centuries.
>
> > Well said.
> > Many westerners still harbor the idea that they are above China's laws.
>
> So does the Chinese government.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On Jan 15, 8:02*am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
> Have the marines landed?

Yes. They will rescue s.c.c from the confused deception of LT Lee.

> On Jan 15, 7:57*am, "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 3:56*am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 14, 9:33*pm, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> > > > the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> > > > establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> > > > is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> > > > Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> > > > lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> > > > five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> > > > land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> > > > decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> > > > independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> > > > Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> > > > up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> > > > under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> > > > MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> > > > has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> > > > The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they tryingto
> > > > fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> > > > allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> > > > burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> > > > rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> > > > powers.
>
> > > > MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> > > > management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> > > > a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> > > > down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> > > > not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> > > > will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> > > > the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> > > > like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> > > > about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> > > > Google should know more about the company first.
>
> > > > China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> > > > seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> > > > about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> > > > Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> > > > something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> > > > can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> > > > have been floating around the world for so many centuries.
>
> > > Well said.
> > > Many westerners still harbor the idea that they are above China's laws.
>
> > So does the Chinese government.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, about time too!
They can also dispel once and for all the use of your name by a
resident troll with the mentality of a 5th grader accusing me of being
the same poster as "Leroy B Jones", "Chairman Mao Says" and "Xangdi".



On Jan 15, 9:14*am, "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 8:02*am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Have the marines landed?
>
> Yes. They will rescue s.c.c from the confused deception of LT Lee.
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 7:57*am, "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 15, 3:56*am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 14, 9:33*pm, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> > > > > the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, itwill
> > > > > establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only ifit
> > > > > is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> > > > > Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> > > > > lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For thepast
> > > > > five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> > > > > land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> > > > > decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> > > > > independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> > > > > Top of the wish list of *the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> > > > > up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> > > > > under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> > > > > MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> > > > > has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> > > > > The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> > > > > fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> > > > > allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> > > > > burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have allthe
> > > > > rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> > > > > powers.
>
> > > > > MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> > > > > management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> > > > > a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> > > > > down for a poor performance review or *be summarily sacked. That would
> > > > > not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> > > > > will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about himto
> > > > > the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> > > > > like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> > > > > about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show supportfor
> > > > > Google should know more about the company first.
>
> > > > > China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> > > > > seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> > > > > about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> > > > > Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> > > > > something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> > > > > can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> > > > > have been floating around the world for so many centuries.
>
> > > > Well said.
> > > > Many westerners still harbor the idea that they are above China's laws.
>
> > > So does the Chinese government.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On Jan 15, 9:14*am, "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 8:02*am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Have the marines landed?
>
> Yes. They will rescue s.c.c from the confused deception of LT Lee.

The the shameful evil filthy ugly uneducated ignorant turkey fool
abianchen/report2009/meichi slut cunt chattering monket's perpetual
lies.

the holocaust was not illegal under Nazi Germany's legal code.

Ethical pygmy

"ltlee1" <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:69f5b96d-20df-41c2-92ba-af37f1da5496@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 14, 9:33 pm, politicosupremo <politicosupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a critical decade for China. If China is allowed to grow at
> the at the rate of the past decade, at the end of this decade, it will
> establish itself as a world power, without any doubt. But only if it
> is allowed to. Why is it conditional? This is because the US-led
> Western powers do not wish to see this happen. To them, this would
> lead to a world which is very unfamiliar and unpalatable. For the past
> five hundred years, a large swath of Asia has been their conquered
> land, their trophies of conquest. It has been their colonies for
> decades. Even after many of these Asian countries have gained
> independence, they are still dependent on the Western powers.
>
> Top of the wish list of the US-led Western powers would be to break-
> up China. Failing this, to contain it. And failing this, to have China
> under its influence politically, economically and culturally. Western
> MNCs will be important instruments in this strategy. The execution
> has began. Google has fired the first shot.
>
> The Westerners should get off their high horse. Who are they trying to
> fool? Human rights and freedom? What about the Muslims? Would they be
> allowed to use the Net to recruit new members for Jihad? Why is the
> burqa not allowed? It is very obvious that the world can have all the
> rights and freedom it wants as long as they do not threaten Western
> powers.
>
> MNCs believe in human rights? MNCs are the most dictatorial in their
> management style. Those White bosses run their overseas branches like
> a dictator. Any employee who openly challenges them will be marked
> down for a poor performance review or be summarily sacked. That would
> not be the end. The employee will find that the doors to other MNCs
> will also be shut - his ex-employee has passed the word about him to
> the other MNCs. They work close-knitted to deal with the locals. MNCs
> like Google should be honest about this before they preach anyone
> about human rights. All those unthinking Chinese who show support for
> Google should know more about the company first.
>
> China should handle this case with extra caution. It should not be
> seen to bow to one Western company. If it does, then it can forget
> about winning in any other negotiation on any other issue with the
> Western powers. The world has enough of Western arrogance. It wants
> something different. It is time for China to show the world that it
> can be an alternative, a better one, than those Western trash which
> have been floating around the world for so many centuries.

Well said.
Many westerners still harbor the idea that they are above China's laws.