Would you also call these people

"pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?

Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.

On Dec 15, 4:26*pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
> Would you also call these people
>
>

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.

No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
but one yet to be.

On Dec 15, 10:58*pm, BBDD <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 4:26*pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Would you also call these people
>
> >

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> > "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> > very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> > They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> > enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> > the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> > Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> > by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.
>
> No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
> the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
> are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
> history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
> even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
> romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
> must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
> were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
> but one yet to be.
>
>

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

You post contact information but never get who I am. I do have a
studio and lab in Emporia. I use that name in association with them.
However, I also have many acres and a home some sixty miles from there
under a different name. Another two hundred miles out and I have an
entire city block of warehouses under another name. I have a business
in Springfield, Missouri, under another name. I have a house and
storefront under still another name in San Francisco. Under a name
different from that I am part owner of yet another business in
Oakland. In all those places one thing is in common. ONLY those who
don’t even have a clue who I am call me Mr..

"BBDD" <baudaboom@gmail.com> wrote
On Dec 15, 4:26 pm, "1X2Willows" wrote:
> Would you also call these people
>
>

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.

No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
but one yet to be.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

- but I am a "pagan", in the sense of Non-Christ (and any of this
other Middle Eastern nonsense) Believer and still don't think of myself
as an "unsophisticated, crude primitive{s} you would not even be able
to stay in a same room with."

Now what? Who is going to have to adapt? Me, as a gate keeper
of sorts or you, as the the one who believes in all this "redeemer"
crap?

I don't think so.

C'm on. Tickle me at least, Lancelot.
Give me something to work with.

"BBDD" <baudaboom@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:690de3ee-289d-4c0e-a116-ccb4ee3ed9d2@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 15, 10:58 pm, BBDD <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 4:26 pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Would you also call these people
>
> >

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> > "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> > very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> > They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> > enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> > the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> > Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> > by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.
>
> No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
> the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
> are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
> history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
> even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
> romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
> must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
> were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
> but one yet to be.
>
>

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

You post contact information but never get who I am. I do have a
studio and lab in Emporia. I use that name in association with them.
However, I also have many acres and a home some sixty miles from there
under a different name. Another two hundred miles out and I have an
entire city block of warehouses under another name. I have a business
in Springfield, Missouri, under another name. I have a house and
storefront under still another name in San Francisco. Under a name
different from that I am part owner of yet another business in
Oakland. In all those places one thing is in common. ONLY those who
don’t even have a clue who I am call me Mr..
~~~~~~~~~

impressive....

On Dec 16, 12:09*am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
> "BBDD" <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote
> On Dec 15, 4:26 pm, "1X2Willows" wrote:
>
> > Would you also call these people
>
> >

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> > "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> > very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> > They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> > enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> > the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> > Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> > by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.
>
> No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
> the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
> are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
> history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
> even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
> romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
> must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
> were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
> but one yet to be.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> - but I am a "pagan", in the sense of Non-Christ (and any of this
> other Middle Eastern nonsense) Believer and still don't think of myself
> as an "unsophisticated, crude primitive{s} you would not even be able
> to stay in a same room with."
>
> Now what? Who is going to have to adapt? Me, as a gate keeper
> of sorts or you, as the the one who believes in all this "redeemer"
> crap?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> C'm on. Tickle me at least, Lancelot.
> Give me something to work with.

You? A gate keeper? You are not a gate keeper. That is delusional. You
are a fascist wanna-be with fanciful notions about what history really
was. You are unable to live in the moment so you make pitiful attempts
at the past.

Anyone who can rap there mind around fact without being driven by
bigotry and prejudice knows darn well the comment does not concern
pagans, but does concern facts of history. Even indoor plumbing is
relatively new. In the world just a few hundred years ago Northern
Europeans were notoriously filthy. That is just historic fact. Has
nothing to do with your lame sense of pagan.

Hell, you are nothing to Christian, let alone pagan. They don’t give
you a thought. Most miss entirely what pagan is. It is not something
one declares themselves to be. It is a Christian’s nigger. They have
to notice you first. They attempted to get my daughter killed. I drive
them up the wall. There are entire Christian sites dedicated to
warning all that merely visiting my sites will lead to possession. You
pagan? You a gate keeper? No one even gives a crap what you imagine
yourself to be. You are not noticed. That is why you resort to methods
of extortion when communicating.

"BBDD" <baudaboom@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c70aeab5-2cca-4d2a-9d08-6e95c5623464@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 16, 12:09 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
> "BBDD" <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote
> On Dec 15, 4:26 pm, "1X2Willows" wrote:
>
> > Would you also call these people
>
> >

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> > "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> > very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> > They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> > enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> > the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> > Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> > by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.
>
> No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
> the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
> are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
> history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
> even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
> romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
> must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
> were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
> but one yet to be.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> - but I am a "pagan", in the sense of Non-Christ (and any of this
> other Middle Eastern nonsense) Believer and still don't think of myself
> as an "unsophisticated, crude primitive{s} you would not even be able
> to stay in a same room with."
>
> Now what? Who is going to have to adapt? Me, as a gate keeper
> of sorts or you, as the the one who believes in all this "redeemer"
> crap?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> C'm on. Tickle me at least, Lancelot.
> Give me something to work with.

You? A gate keeper? You are not a gate keeper. That is delusional. You
are a fascist wanna-be with fanciful notions about what history really
was. You are unable to live in the moment so you make pitiful attempts
at the past.

Anyone who can rap there mind around fact without being driven by
bigotry and prejudice knows darn well the comment does not concern
pagans, but does concern facts of history. Even indoor plumbing is
relatively new. In the world just a few hundred years ago Northern
Europeans were notoriously filthy. That is just historic fact. Has
nothing to do with your lame sense of pagan.

Hell, you are nothing to Christian, let alone pagan. They don’t give
you a thought. Most miss entirely what pagan is. It is not something
one declares themselves to be. It is a Christian’s nigger. They have
to notice you first. They attempted to get my daughter killed. I drive
them up the wall. There are entire Christian sites dedicated to
warning all that merely visiting my sites will lead to possession. You
pagan? You a gate keeper? No one even gives a crap what you imagine
yourself to be. You are not noticed. That is why you resort to methods
of extortion when communicating.
~~~~~~~~~~~

That's a *PLONK* on this thread as well.
Good luck next time around.

On Dec 16, 12:43*am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
> "BBDD" <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c70aeab5-2cca-4d2a-9d08-6e95c5623464@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 16, 12:09 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "BBDD" <baudab...@gmail.com> wrote
> > On Dec 15, 4:26 pm, "1X2Willows" wrote:
>
> > > Would you also call these people
>
> > >

Code:

Content visible to registered users only.

>
> > > "pagan ~ a more or less violent and superstitious type that smelled
> > > very bad and slung their poo, like monkeys, into common areas.
> > > They were riddled with disease from venereal to gingivitis that were
> > > enough to scare away demons and manifest gods" as you called
> > > the pre-christian indigenous people of Europe?
>
> > > Simple question. Yes or no will do. Please don't side-track the issue
> > > by way of another one of your infamous rants about fascism. Ciao.
>
> > No, I would call them by whatever they wish. To make a statement about
> > the history of pagans is not to even call a pagan a pagan. You idiots
> > are into the labels, not me. Remember? Those YOU think of, from
> > history, as pagan were unsophisticated, crude primitives you would not
> > even be able to stay in a same room with. You, not me. I pig farm. You
> > romanticize them into something very different from historic fact. One
> > must acknowledge what wisdom they possessed without forgetting they
> > were flawed. The wisest and most spiritual culture is not one past,
> > but one yet to be.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > - but I am a "pagan", in the sense of Non-Christ (and any of this
> > other Middle Eastern nonsense) Believer and still don't think of myself
> > as an "unsophisticated, crude primitive{s} you would not even be able
> > to stay in a same room with."
>
> > Now what? Who is going to have to adapt? Me, as a gate keeper
> > of sorts or you, as the the one who believes in all this "redeemer"
> > crap?
>
> > I don't think so.
>
> > C'm on. Tickle me at least, Lancelot.
> > Give me something to work with.
>
> You? A gate keeper? You are not a gate keeper. That is delusional. You
> are a fascist wanna-be with fanciful notions about what history really
> was. You are unable to live in the moment so you make pitiful attempts
> at the past.
>
> Anyone who can rap there mind around fact without being driven by
> bigotry and prejudice knows darn well the comment does not concern
> pagans, but does concern facts of history. Even indoor plumbing is
> relatively new. In the world just a few hundred years ago Northern
> Europeans were notoriously filthy. That is just historic fact. Has
> nothing to do with your lame sense of pagan.
>
> Hell, you are nothing to Christian, let alone pagan. They don’t give
> you a thought. Most miss entirely what pagan is. It is not something
> one declares themselves to be. It is a Christian’s nigger. They have
> to notice you first. They attempted to get my daughter killed. I drive
> them up the wall. There are entire Christian sites dedicated to
> warning all that merely visiting my sites will lead to possession. You
> pagan? You a gate keeper? No one even gives a crap what you imagine
> yourself to be. You are not noticed. That is why you resort to methods
> of extortion when communicating.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> That's a *PLONK* on this thread as well.
> Good luck next time around.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Good luck with what, slut? No one wants to fuck you.